WHO PAYS THE PRICE FOR RESPECTING THAT WHICH DOESN’T DESERVE RESPECT?
"...a fatuously stupid 'belief in belief'. It is hard to know which is the more evil, these Islamic customs themselves or the craven, cowardly, and above all PATRONIZING 'respect' for them which the rest of us are expected to show." Richard Dawkins
Multiculturalists believe they are defending immigrants. But in fact they are betraying 51% of them---women.
Environmentalists who praise 'cultural diversity' because they think it analogous to the healthy variation in natural systems are the unwitting architects of the loss of biodiversity. Only mass migration can breath life into subcultures that for want of new arrivals would assimilate. To keep the circus going fresh infusions of foreigners are required, and these numbers help to crowd out wildlife habitat and vanquish species. And as Garrett Hardin observed, in a multicultural nation each "tribe" lobbies government for a larger intake. Culturally homogeneous nations like Japan can more easily reach consensus to reduce their populations, as the Japanese did by cutting their post-war birth rate in half in just a decade. In a nutshell, multiculturalism is bad for the environment. So as they would say in California, take your choice. Is it Redwoods, or Immigrants? Mountain lions or tacos?
Home of Multiculturalism
Growing cities, Vanishing Wilderness